High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : sluzurdDqNQ
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #dcdbd2 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 2d252c1f4aed702e9ae81bb2f8778629dbd9423f9908086b8a678fe7dc367fe53d9b5548427df2440385ccde1056ae2d
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732666544789 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : c2x1enVyZERxTlEgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
2,341 Views • Nov 28, 2023 • Click to toggle off description
How well do you know Pocket Jacks? This 3-question #poker #quiz tests your knowledge of this challenging hand, and you get answers for all of them. If you miss any, be sure to watch the entire Science of JJ video here:    • The Science Of Pocket Jacks (JJ) | Sp...  
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 2,341
Genre: Gaming
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Nov 28, 2023 ^^


warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.908 (3/127 LTDR)

97.69% of the users lieked the video!!
2.31% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.53- Overwhelmingly Positive

RYD date created : 2024-01-04T22:12:29.037697Z
See in json
Connections
Nyo connections found on the description ;_; report an issue lol

9 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@AmericanBoy1776

11 months ago

Let’s go. Too easy. Cool quiz. I enjoyed that. Even with three overs showing up on the flop. Unless they flop a set, I’m going all in for for $60K all-in. Pockets Jacks also behave like J10. Monster rockets that kills those aces yo!!!

1 |

@synchronium24

11 months ago

I understand the point of the 3rd question is don't fold when your JJ gets 3bet, but the wording could be improved. Folding is defined as 0 EV, so as written the answer would be "breakeven".

EDIT: Maybe ask about calling in the same scenario to remove the ambiguity. That would be +EV.

1 |

@HWCWTD

11 months ago

I'm not sure about the second 1. Wouldn't calling be more appropriate?

|

Go To Top