PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #bca1a8 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: b577cfbe1718527046c2dcb8cec0d696a4dcf4da4e6a8df93e39ae86ed7e96ba630f6e4cbe9adb363eca51d427601441
Proxy : woke-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1746495933528 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : czJHck9TeWQ2VVEgaSAgbG92ICB1IHdva2UtcHJveHkucG9rZXR1YmUuZnVu
143 : true
1,478,432 Views • Oct 9, 2024 • Click to toggle off description
Views : 1,478,432
Genre: Education
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Oct 9, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.905 (1,488/60,848 LTDR)
97.61% of the users lieked the video!!
2.39% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.42- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2025-01-19T08:51:02.582486Z
See in json
478 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Vat iz it sinking about?
2.6K | 29
"This iz ze German coastguard. What are you sinking about?"
1.4K | 12
just need to bring in the Dutch experts before 2067....
862 | 14
The alternative would have been to build a smaller version as a test and operate it for years to study the conditions then plan and build accordingly. They did some sort of planning and testing but severely underestimated it. Real world testing for years would have been astronomically expensive and likely derailed the entire project. So they did what they could and are paying the price.
320 | 11
Sounds like a fantastically difficult, but exciting geotechnical project!!!
363 | 0
You would think they would raise it enough over the sea level.
But no.
154 | 4
So they’ll either need to build massive floodwalls around the artificial island or what, inject concrete into deep shafts or drive very long piles under the entire island to stabilize? With the tsunami threat I’m honestly surprised it isn’t surrounded by tall flood walls anyway
67 | 4
50cm a year would mean its sunk by 15m in 30 years. It has actually "only" sunk just over 8m since that time.
180 | 4
1cm a year is too much.
50cm a year is catastrophic.
14 | 0
2067???!!! That cannot be worth it
71 | 9
When you suddenly hear the airport on the radio during your landing approach: „Mayday - we‘re sinking!“
2 | 0
For any people wondering why Japan doesn't just build an airport on land, go research. Their country is smaller than California but has a 1/3 of the U.S. population, or roughly 130 million people. Yes they have over 7800 islands, yet a lot of them are protected. Although its extremely expensive, its just more practical for their own land to build an airport of that size on water.
3 | 1
Build a water proof wall around it, install 100s of drainage sumps and pumps on the site.
4 | 0
They need to make it float
2 | 0
Japan have to call Indian jack lifting techies 😂
3 | 0
It has been sinking beyond original design data about six months before it opened. There are I believe four upgrades to take place after the first review was made each depending on the prior before being started.
| 0
50cm a year? O.o that's a lot.
32 | 2
Sounds, or reminds me of millennium tower in San Francisco USA. It's over 50 floors & is both leaning & sinking a hell of a lot because of the piles weren't deep enough . Maybe the same there. It was built on silty clay.
3 | 0
For a country beset by seismic activity, building an airport on poor ground is a bit of lack of foresight from a country which excels in engineering. 🤔
23 | 3
@leoharoshi2042
6 months ago
50cm a year is quite a lot
5.4K | 35