PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 86,387
Genre: Education
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Sep 7, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.971 (61/8,261 LTDR)
99.27% of the users lieked the video!!
0.73% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 98.91- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2024-11-29T20:59:48.345501Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Iām still mad that no one can sue these idiot lawmakers for practicing medicine without a license or medical neglectā¦ thatās what this amounts to. Criminal medical neglect. Instead of a quick, relatively cheap procedure, we have people who are being left until they need hundreds of thousands of dollars of medical care.
1.4K |
This is why it's scary to even consider pregnancy in a state that isn't protecting access. Everyone assumes the laws will cover cases where the life of the mother is at risk. Plenty of people are so confidently incorrect in saying this is ridiculous, that our lives are not in danger.
Any time our doctors are more concerned with their safety than our care, our lives are in danger. And doctors are people and thus deserve to prioritize their safety.
Really, we just need politicians to step out of medical care and let doctors do their jobs.
717 |
I was so relieved when Ireland legalised abortion, they're our neighbours in the uk and so many of us have Irish family and loved ones and we all knew what had happened to Savita Halappanavar, a woman who died of sepsis after being denied an abortion during her miscarriage because one twin still had a heart beat and that it should never happen again to any woman. Reading about her last days of life was horrific as she sat with one child rotting inside her while the other slowly died and her along with it. It was such a relief, such a good thing when they changed the part of their constitution banning abortion. My heart sank hearing about Roe v Wade. So many of those "pro life" people celebrating said of course women wouldn't be put in danger over this, of course there would be exceptions if the womans life was in danger but those of us who remember Savita know that that's not good enough. That women still die when you're not allowed to intervene until they're actively dying themselves, that if thry survive they can be rendered infertile as well as permanently disabled from a range of conditions and I am so angry on behalf of all the women who live in America that now have to fear pregnancy or fear for their future not knowing if or when their rights will be stolen from them, most of all I'm angry for every woman whose life is put behind that of someone not even born yet.
65 |
Guys, I'm from Ireland. Please learn from my country's horrific history of neglect and medical mistreatment of pregnant women. We saw what happens when women are denied access to abortions, we saw a young woman die a horrific death due to sepsis. This is why we removed the section of our constitution which effectively made access to abortions illegal. Please don't repeat our horrible mistakes and allow women to suffer.
RIP Savita Halappanavar
479 |
I live in Texas and in my only pregnancy I had really bad hyperemesis gravidarum.
Like, at points they gave me antiemetic meds via IV and I was still vomiting or dry heaving every 15 minutes or so.
I couldnāt even keep down droplets of water.
Because of this, I donāt want to get pregnant again. I have PTSD from that pregnancy and I endured it because I wanted my baby SO much, but I donāt think I could survive doing it again. Plus, at best doing it again would take me away from my existing kid for 9-ish months because Iād be so ill.
Worst case, I wouldnāt make it or I could have other severe complications like esophageal rupture or encephalopathy.
Iāve told anti-choice people all this before and they always claim that in my case āwhen it gets bad enoughā Iād be eligible for pregnancy termination.
When I ask them whereās the line? When is it ābad enoughā? They never have a clear answer.
Because thereās a big difference between the line being early in pregnancy when Iām getting weak and constantly going to the ER and unable to take care of my kid vs later in pregnancy when my esophagus ruptures and Iām at risk of sepsis or hemorrhage.
Plus, they almost never believe me that it doesnāt matter because neither is enough to get a pregnancy termination in Texas.
They sleep easy at night thinking that the people whose lives are at risk are getting the care they need, and they ignore all the evidence to the contrary.
68 |
I'm still struggling immensely with the fact that my three beautiful grown daughters have fewer rights than I did at their ages. I can only hope and pray that none of them are ever forced to carry a pregnancy or, heaven forbid, if they do become pregnant, ever suffer complications. I'm so scared for them š¢
And I'm soooooooo angry at what this country is becoming!!!
12 |
Hereās my thoughts: if itās not your embryo, itās not your choice. By this I mean random politicians, religious Karens, neighbors, friends and randos online. The mom and dad should be able to have a say and the doctor should be allowed, without fear of prosecution, to handle those decisions. Someone who doesnāt have a medical license (besides the parents obviously) should NOT be allowed to practice medicine.
32 |
This is what happened to Savita. They had to wait till she was septic before they could abort. It was too late and she died.
Her husband lost their much wanted and loved baby and his wife on the same day, because the doctors weren't allowed save her. He helped us repeal the 8th amendment in Ireland and save women's lives.
263 |
Another thing : you mention having to wait until people are near death. Doesn't that kind of situation create more negative health outcomes after they get care/recover ? Like, sepsis isn't a neutral medical event, I'm not a doctor but what if it permanently damages the kidneys or the liver ? What about an organ failure or a transplant because an organ failed because you couldn't terminate a pregnancy?? When we mean maternal/pregnant people's health to be preserved thanks to abortion IT SHOULD 100% be done at the earliest to avoid the person's long term health be compromised !
39 |
Laws are made for everyone. If they cannot be applied safely in that manner and the application is unrealistic and cruel and inaccessible, then they are not to be in existence at all. Especially not in a country framing itself as "interested in human rights" while trampling all over them at a million completely open instances each year.
80 |
Are "exceptions" that aren't used because of the vagueness of the language, lack of physicians willing to use them (either due to healthcare desert or fear), or hospital attorneys who refuse to allow their physicians to use them.... really exceptions? Because to me it's just language for politicians and forced birthers to use to pretend they are being reasonable and accommodating. In reality, there are no exceptions if they aren't being used.
81 |
@jessicastevens5782
5 months ago
and it doesn't account for the consequences of delaying medical treatment - brain damage, loss of fertility, amputation, kidney failure, etc.
1K |