PokeVideoPlayer v0.9-rev1 - licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 405
Genre:
Uploaded At May 2, 2023 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.75 (1/15 LTDR)
93.75% of the users lieked the video!!
6.25% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 90.63- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2023-05-02T14:19:43.390697Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The use of the phrase "God is sovereign," is the pretext of Calvinist doctrine. Their understanding of sovereignty is in opposition to the righteousness of God, because God is just, and merciful.
God is not willing that any should perish, but Calvinists do not agree. When they cannot explain their doctrine, they say who am I to question God. The irony is that God does not prevent them from misrepresenting him and his word, even blasphemy because they deny his righteousness. God is jealous for his name's sake.
11 |
When I hear these two on Remnant Radio expound theology, and give their opinions on others' teachings and ministries, I am startled by their unjustified self-confidence. Without speaking to the people they critique, and by relying only to those who claim to be "experts," they become, in their own minds, "authorities." Thus, they spout their judgments without a scintilla of doubt, secure in an inflated sense of their own wisdom. God have mercy!
3 |
Very Calvinism focus. Thw sovereignty of God is that all be saved and Jesus provided healing for all. So if that is the case, then He wants all to be saved and healed. Or does the stripes and Cross of Jesus not work for some people because God limited the work of the cross? Dangerous theology to me
4 |
As a Pentecostal when i hear the term 'Charismatics' i picture a wholewide interdenominational group consist of Catholics , Baptists, Wesley Arminians, Presbyterian Calvinists etc who believe in gifts of the spirit and especialy speaking in tongues , usually the charismatic catholics would not use the term 'Church' , they prefer the word church will only be reserved to catholic institution while on protestant side when we hear the term Charismatic Church it is mostly refer to 'interdenominational' meaning holding protestant doctrine yet prefer to be neutral between Arminian and Calvinism
However since 2000's til now there has been a trend of this 'charismatic interdenominational' churches especially the hyper grace, friendly seeker and huge mega type of churches to be more leaning on Calvinism . I think it's more enticing to the flesh of many people when they hear OSAS a.k.a being both saved and living sinfull without eternal consequences .
So, by that case i'm sorry i knid of disagree with your opinion because many of this present day charismatics are totally different from the charismatics of the 90's or even back in late 70's. I sadly have to agree with the Remnnant Radio at least may be partially meaning i still keep my finger cross hoping the protestant's side of charismatics would be still 50:50 between Arminians and Calvinists , but sadly again the trend is leaning more to Calvinism . Thank God i still hold on to my pentecostal root , saved and sanctified in the fear of the Lord.
|
Even if he met Charismatics that actually talked like that, it would most probably mean God heals miraculously and instantaneously
when he wants to, and he does it through natural means when he so desires, but his will is to always heal in response to faith.
And that's right, Jesus never mentioned God's will when healing someone, he mentioned belief, prayer and fasting, he even considered the sick person's will, so to speak, when asking what they wanted him to do for them, but didn't insert "If it's God's will" when driving disease out of someone, just like Calvinists don't put "If it be God's will" when telling someone they will be saved by trusting and confessing Jesus as Lord, 'cause we know God promised that, it is his will, those are the terms of his sovereignly-instituted covenant.
Problem is Reformed people tend to over-emphasize sovereignity over God's truthfulness, so that he can sovereignily choose to not answer a faith prayer in Jesus' name even if Jesus himself told us he would, he acts on a case-by-case basis, practical conclusion being that the word "covenant" is rendered meaningless, you just never know what he'll do, except for letting you enter heaven and resurrecting you, all other clauses of the contract, specially those pertaining to this present life, are up for grabs.
There's a notion in some Calvinist circles that states that Jesus was so perfect and filled with the Holy Ghost that he would always know beforehand wheter it was God's will to heal or deliver someone, and that's why all his prayers were answered, but that applied only to him, the apostles, and some chosen disciples that had that healing or faith gift when it was available ('cuz you know, cessationism), that's what I thought when I was staunchly Reformed, but now I believe it isn't Biblical enough.
|
@Civan09
1 year ago
I'm a Charismatic for long too..And I would say you are right. I think what he says..explains Calvinism.
10 |