Views : 9,664
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Dec 13, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.165 (153/580 LTDR)
79.13% of the users lieked the video!!
20.87% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 68.69- Positive
RYD date created : 2024-06-02T21:21:00.05606Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I agree completely, the kind of people who debate about whether a certain group should exist aren't the type to be open minded and objective. They literally start with the assumption you are less of a person. When they make "arguments" about trans existence they aren't bringing up valid points that make us question if they are a group of people that shouldn't be taken seriously , more often than not its propaganda like Matt Walsh's "What is a women" meant to shame and hate on anyone who supports that community. I watched that film, and I don't think any rational human being cannot see through this obvious lie.
15 |
Oh this is such a cop out. Without specifying what you think of as racist or transphobic, then literally any topic related to race or gender could be barred.
For example, Transmedicalism is controversial within the trans community. Some trans people support this idea and some trans people view it as transphobic. So does that mean you'll never debate or discuss this idea because some people view it as transphobic?
6 |
I think this is a really bad take from a philosophy channel. If your ideas are correct you should be willing and able to defend them.
It makes me a better person if my beliefs in anti racism, homophobia, transphobia are put to the test. Rather than me saying â Im right because Iâm right, no further discussion neededâ.
This is how people fall into right wing pipelineâs because the only people willing to question and discuss difficult topics are people right wing grifters. And there isnât adequate pushback for right wing talking points in the culture.
19 |
I donât think that a reasonable person would argue for transphobia. I think that they argue that it doesnât exist or that liberals and progressives are taking things too far. If you wanna describe that as transphobia thatâs fine. But the problem is is that now you canât debate the truth of the matter if trans people exist how they exist and what we do for them and what we canât do for them, because if you just say that you wonât debate hateful ideas, thatâs OK but the problem is that you wonât debate anything then because they could all fall under hateful ideas.
2 |
Adding the caveat that I believe that every human regardless of race, gender, sexuality ect. Should ideally have access to what they need to live happily, healthily, and safely, donât you think that there is a significant number of people who use this line of thinking in an intellectually dishonest way? Not that Iâm accusing you in particular of this, but I feel like I see people refuse to engage with what I see as a reasonable, not hateful contradiction of their beliefs on the grounds that they assume (or merely accuse) the contradictor is coming from a place of bigotry
1 |
@Hreodrich
1 month ago
We donât have values here. Anyway here are some value statements.
20 |