PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #dfdbda (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: db9c9548bed52ec45eac3595a4e532e11de025038202edd50764a97574d9a7273e05cef7504a87af671f441bcb148b39
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1730262266437 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : aWZIM3lpSkYyTjQgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
1,134,621 Views ā¢ Aug 26, 2024 ā¢ Click to toggle off description
Views : 1,134,621
Genre: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Aug 26, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.904 (1,972/79,943 LTDR)
97.59% of the users lieked the video!!
2.41% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.39- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-10-30T04:15:56.094676Z
See in json
1,089 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Nah screw that, the whole "it'll cost more to fight then it's worth" has stolen so much from so many good people.
9.4K |
Example of why this is terrible. I ran a small engineering firm. We had a client just refuse to pay the final $10k on a project. They said, in an email, "we're not paying you because we're on the other side of the country, and it'll cost you more than $10k to win". I brought that email to 3 different attorneys who all said they were right.
7.4K |
Basically, what this does, is make it unfeasible for regular people to peruse legal action, while those with lots of money can prosecute at will.
Idiotic system.
2.1K |
That song probably got stuck in his head for a good few minutes
4.9K |
It's a bad thing. We have the opposite system in Germany. Usually the losing side pays for the costs of the suit, including the costs of the court.
It makes people consider filing a lawsuit according to how sure they are that they have the law on their side, not how deep their pockets are. Especially since most people have a legal expenses insurence, that pays for their lawers, when they get sued.
619 |
I feel like if the light was red and you stopped, you're 100% winning because, legally, you had to stop. This is also why having dashcam is so good to have
841 |
His neck (his neck!) His back (his back!)
1.4K |
The duality of not being absolutely ruined if you fail a lawsuit but also being screwed by people with too much money dragging things out as long as possible to make your own fees painfully expensive
326 |
No, it's not a good thing, and it's stupdi say it is. Not getting legal expenses covered, even when you win, gives the rich far more power in the legal system than working class people. Rich people and corporations can simply attempt to drown legal opponents in lawyers fees, and even people who are 100% in the right often end up having to cave in, because they can't afford the continued legal fees.
The entire idea of SLAPP lawsuits which is a plague in America only works because you end up sitting on your legal fees, even when you win.
And America is one of the only countries on the planet that uses this system, and there's a reason why almost no other country does it that way. Guaranteeing legal fees when you win evens the playing field and enables lower income people to continue fighting in court without fear of bankruptcy when they know they're in the right.
455 |
In my country if an insurance claim is denied, you can make a case at the ombudsman. You can see a lawyer beforehand, but neither party is allowed a lawyer there. The ombud is one guy who you need to explain the situation to. His ruling has the same legal enforcement as a court order.
153 |
Depends, especially when youāre barred from vindicating your rights solely due to it not being economical, especially when accused (at least in criminal you can get AN attorney) or against the government (civil asset forfeiture springs to mind). I can understand when thereās a genuine confusion, legal fees can be a deterrent, but as you get to the blatant side (cops taking your money and when you need to sue to get it back) thereās no chance for you to get made whole, thatās where I see the lawsuit as a direct or proximate economic damage.
417 |
In general, the problem is that it shouldn't be individual vs. insurance company where medical bills are concerned. The injured individual should be covered by his own insurance, and they should be the ones going after the other insurance company.
159 |
To be fair it depends on how it's implemented. In Ireland we have a system were fees are capped so the solicitor and barrister so if they spend a lot more and you win the cost not on you it's on them and generally fees aren't always awarded even if you lose because the judge decides basically if the claim was in good faith enough to not bankrupt them. It's fair and it ensures you don't have a team of solicitors and barristers unless the case pays enough for them to get a cut
29 |
Soo much easier here in Sweden.
1. No health care cost for me (expect some very minor).
2. The insurance company (his) will pay the damage. (And my insurance will pay any unprobably lawyer cost.)
3. There is no chance in hell that I will lose any sort of legal dispute (as in a case like this).
41 |
Braked is correct past tense of the verb "to brake" (to take action to reduce speed).
Broke is past tense of the verb "to break" (to take action to damage or destroy something).
11 |
āWorlds best countryā my ass
7 |
My neck, my back, anxiety attack.
9 |
Neck back .... *Stares* has me GAGGED
158 |
In the UK, we have the idea that generally if you lose a case you were in the wrong, you pay the legal fees. You're the one that's done this, you're the one that pays.
82 |
@Amy_Dunn
2 months ago
The office friendly version "My neck, my back, my outlook and my slack." š
11K |