PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-aug2025_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 5,904
Genre: Science & Technology
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At 10 months ago ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.917 (7/332 LTDR)
97.94% of the users lieked the video!!
2.06% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.91- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-11-20T21:08:01.690347Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
OUR Reality doesn't get any smaller, a very important distinction. The question is what's on the other end of the scale? A plank length is the smallest; what would be the largest unit before it stops making any sense? At some point, the unit is so ridiculously large that it ceases to make any sense. Could this be where our reality ends and another begins?
6 | 1
Most people don't understand planck units. There is a reason there can't be a length smaller than the planck length, or a volume small than the planck volume. Smaller than that and just like in the center of a black hole where a Singularity lies, all of our mathematical, measurement, and experiential understanding of physics breaks down and become meaningless. In fact, it was worked out that the amount of energy to observe a region of space that small, one has to inject so much energy in such a small space that a black hole would form. So if that is the smallest unit that can be, that portends a pixelated universe.
8 | 4
They're not like pixels. This is extremely misleading. A pixel is on or off. It can only be a few colors. A pixel has 3 properties, toggle (meaning on or off), color, and brightness. You can represent this using a combination of 1s and 0s.
In reality, each unit of space has much more information than what a pixel has, and is NOT binary like a computer.
You have mass, charge, spin, color charge, momentum, lifetime in that space. But not just that, you can have entanglement, meaning the quanta in that space is also dependent upon another space and quanta within it.
Particles exist in superposition, they don’t just exist as either in one position or another. A particle can be effectively in two places at once by being capable of interacting with things in both places. Then there can be probabilities of it's location, meaning you can have 2 quanta of space and a particle can be 70% likely to be in one and 30% in another.
So within the quantized units of space lies and unquantized probability distribution. Despite the fact that each quanta of space is distinct, it's actually not provable that it's either full or not full.
In reality, yes, it is either full or not, according to quantum realists. They say it's just that the probability distribution tells you where the particle is more likely to be interacted with, not that it's actually in both places.
However, for pragmatic purposes, and for the purposes of computing, the quanta of space possess probabilities of being full or not, and therefore are not represented by 1s and 0s, but by decimals, rounding to the nearest 1 or 0 by chance upon interaction, which means we introduce a NEW bit of information, which is interaction, so other quanta existing and interacting also change the information, in a pragmatic sense, of any particular quantum of space.
It's not a simulation. Nothing about it is like a computer, it's antithetical to computers.
4 | 3
@dustinhaas8538
10 months ago
Quanta, the quantum world is quantized. It’s right in the name, “pixels” is a misleading analogy.
14 | 1