PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 337,692
Genre: Gaming
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Oct 28, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.861 (588/16,298 LTDR)
96.52% of the users lieked the video!!
3.48% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 94.78- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-11-27T14:28:17.244009Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I viewed this rule change as more of a loss in a cardâs value as a combat trick, but maybe the intent is that blockers have too much power to start with. Overall, it feels very weird for the interaction to now be:
âI play this card at this niche time to punish your aggressionâ followed by
âAight I use this rule to benefit my attack the most without using any card valueâ
Idk, weâll see, maybe itâll be more fun, maybe not.
5 |
I'll miss the double blocking tricks to completely blow out attackers to win on the spot but this is ultimately a good change that makes more sense and encourages players to attack more and we still can blow them out with tricks it's just harder now and more often we just force them to effectively trade down witch is still is a nice. Going to be interested in how online will work as assigning damage should take longer than order the blocker and it'll probably be broken for a bit as it's already buggy.
1 |
@MTGRecon
4 weeks ago
Clarification for those who may still be confused: Defenders still get a chance to respond after declaring blockers, they just donât know how damage will be divided among multiple blocking creatures when they get priority.
Hence âgiving your opponent no opportunity to respond knowing how damage will be dividedâ
199 |