PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 72,766
Genre: Education
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Mar 6, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.965 (42/4,708 LTDR)
99.12% of the users lieked the video!!
0.88% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 98.68- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2024-11-11T14:26:36.309424Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I’m from Appalachia and I’m about 80% colonial era British in my ethnic background with no immigrant ancestors arriving after 1790. I’ve only found a handful of ancestors who lived in Barbados. Most of my ancestors came directly from England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Granted I’m from West Virginia not the Deep South but at least in my southern state most of the people are descended from settlers who came directly to Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania from Europe directly. I’ve found people who came from the Caribbean in my background but honestly I’ve found far more indentured servants and direct migrants than Caribbean immigrants.
216 |
Yes, alot of the FIRST wave of colonists, the rich plantation owners, merchants, etc. were from Barbados. BUT a significant portion were the folks who came from Ireland (Ulster Scots) who bypassed the plantations on the coast and headed for the backcountry. Study Carolina history, and you'll see the tensions between the rich, elite, Anglican, plantation-owning Englishmen from Barbados and the poor, "deplorable", Presbyterian, subsistence farming Scots-Irish from Ireland (with a good smattering of Saxe-Coburg Lutherans in there too). See the Regulator movement, just prior to the Revolution, for proof. Schools in the 1920s taught that in addition to the southern, mid-atlantic, and new england colonies, there was the backcountry, which had more in common with each other than the colonies to which they were attached (i.e., a backcountryman from Pennsylvania would have more in common with a backcountryman from South Carolina than he would a colonist in Philadelphia). Schools don't teach about that 4th area anymore.
10 |
Before reaching the Americas the early colonial empires went for the islands around the Atlantic. For Spain, they started in the Canary Islands, Portugal in the Azores, France with Corsica, and Britain in Ireland. Soon they crossed the Atlantic into the Carribean until finally landing on the American mainland.
3 |
For the deep south yes, for the Highlands south, it was a mix between West German, Scott Irish and Prussian Heritage. This lead to a Militaristic South that the USA still calls upon for the majority of it's Armed Forces, and led to a Southern Unification heritage, that was caught onto and ran with with via the KKK and People like Woodrow Wilson.
The South Always had a Genetic, Demographical, Geographic and Even historical claim to Succession thanks to Lincoln's actions in the immediate period before the Civil War. But then they lost the War, which despite modern ideas they could have infact won. They had chances to, but via Generals not bring familiar with new and modern technology, along with early war jitters, the South surrendered it's Early War Dominating Battle where they could have swarmed into DC and capture the vast majority of Congress and Lincoln.
Also no, that's not Southern Wishfully thinking, a bunch of the Congressmen and civilians went out to watch and picnic at some pivotal battles, especially the First Bull Run.
20 |
My ancestors came directly from England, Wales, Ireland, Germany, and Ulster. Our family has lived in the south since the 1600's. I know dozens and dozens of families and their history that live here in the south. None went through Barbados to get here. Please back it up with some creditable statistics.
4 |
@suhnih4076
8 months ago
Crazy to think so many americans came from such a small island
730 |