PokeVideoPlayer v0.9-rev1 - licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #d97971 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeTubeEncryptID: c828919e6c806e865f98c939b8a3f9441ca33e706ad97540aaeb3efafe758981fac99a39dff73db6d29c0009674d8992
Proxy : usa-proxy2.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1727204362863 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : Y1l2elpySHZrSU0gaSAgbG92ICB1IHVzYS1wcm94eTIucG9rZXR1YmUuZnVu
143 : true
30,462 Views ā¢ Apr 22, 2024 ā¢ Click to toggle off description
Views : 30,462
Genre:
Uploaded At Apr 22, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.811 (79/1,590 LTDR)
95.27% of the users lieked the video!!
4.73% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 92.91- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-08-17T02:21:37.917266Z
See in json
YouTube Comments - 169 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Yep.
2 |
Love Sabine
2 |
I value the perspective that Sabine presents. In my eyes, mathematics resembles a Sculptor that captures a precise representation of an object. Even if that object is a lifelike simulation of reality, there will always be an insufficient number of numbers to fully encapsulate the complexities of the real world.
Consider it akin to a pixelated picture; while the colors may be striking, a closer look reveals the limitations of the simulation. Thereās nothing further to discover or explore.
|
Our best working theories are formal descriptions couched in mathematics and sometimes new mathematics. Thatās not likely to ever change.
2 |
Mathematics are like a picture of a mountain: The picture is not the mountain. It's just an abstraction.
91 |
Yes! This is central to why we canāt resolve the cosmic with the quantum, the continuum with the discrete. I donāt have the answer but it will be a new form of math. Why PEMDAS, counting is one thing, relationships are another, itās wonderfully convoluted!
|
Then you're in the right camp, Sabine. ššā
|
Very interesting. Is there an alternative to mathematics that describes what we observe any where near as accurately?
8 |
we dont know the limit in our ability to perceive true reality, that is the fundamental problem
3 |
The question I'd ask is: are ideas like quantum mechanics actually theories or just models? The differentiation being is there a comprehensible idea behind it from which the equations derived.
I sometimes wonder if Einstein calling the cosmological constant hiss greatest blunder was not because of the expanding universe evidence making it redundant but because it didn't originate from a fundamental idea about how the universe works.
|
Math is a measure of certain aspects of reality. Surely everything thought or perceived including math is part of reality? Reality itself might not be real in a way humans are able to perceive. It is what it is but what it is words cannot describe.
1 |
A man once asked Picasso to paint a portrait of his wife and showed him a photo of her - "This is my wife", he said. Picasso looked at the photo and said, "Small, isn't she?".
35 |
Materialism basically leads to the idea that reality is mathematics. Because all material phenomena can be described precisely by mathematics, the question is what could be possibly left over that mathematics leaves out? If there is a reality that is irreducible to mathematics it points to panpsychism or idealism, the idea that qualia and experience are fundamental.
|
Math is human invention like speech and alphabet... these three inventions are timeless, they will exist till the last man on earth. These are the only available tools to describe science today. It does not mean that there would be no more tools other then these ones. All depends on the limits of the human intelligence.
1 |
Well that makes 2 of us, Sabina. Always a pleasure to listen, thank you. Peace āļø š from Canada, eh
10 |
Absolutelyā¤
|
As a Philosopher, an engineer and a historian, I can realise every time here and there, there is an absolutely staggering oblivion of a great tradition of thinkers whose works has had a deep insight on these topics. And, actually, they belong to the German tradition of philosophy who deals with these topics until 1950. Since that date there have no been further notice under the sun. It seems that humanity tends to forget or to deny openly what weāve already learned before. The first case is the case of what we see in this video. The second one is the case of the communism reload with the costume of genre ideology, feminism and all that pseudoscience. We can say with Sor Juana InĆ©s de la Cruz, for those who thought once that communism was dead, that Ā«These deads enjoy of good healthĀ». At the end, the good Mario Bunge was absolutely right when he was among the firsts in criticise these anti scientific positions.
|
Real enlightening stuff there gurl
|
I see physics as primary, mathematics is then extrapolated based off of physical regularities. If you can count to n, then n+1, infinity is not so much of a leap.
|
@lucascritchi
5 months ago
Sabine is awesome! Astonishing intelligent woman!
22 |