PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 468,294
Genre: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Oct 9, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.94 (548/36,278 LTDR)
98.51% of the users lieked the video!!
1.49% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.77- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-11-21T20:40:31.866699Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
One thing I've learned working in IT is that some employees exist as gap fillers, or inefficiency sinks, and often enough they don't do that much throughout the day. Instead they have a wide variety of small things they cover that prevent each of the more efficient employees from having to upset their workflow to do some minor thing.
I am one of those types. They send me so that the people doing real work don't have to wast a third of their shift doing something small.
322 |
In software engineering there's a parallel to this known as Brooks' Law; after a certain point in a project, adding extra staff to it can make it take longer. Teaching and integrating them, communication overheads due to increased people, and there only being indivisible work (nine pregnant women can't have one baby in one month) mean that you lose productivity.
1.1K |
People needing assistance with 10% sounds right but you shouldn't be doing all the helping. Have a senior employee for whom all questions get funneled thru. Or if you prefer a flatter office structure, a rule that you must ask three coworkers before asking Mike, And then if none of them know you then teach all four.
200 |
That’s why you get a one of the those things the business world calls a “manager” to assist and delegate responsibilities. I know “hierarchy” is a naughty word in today’s world; however, it’s what has been tried and proved best wether you’re a law firm, or restaurant or paramilitary organization. It’s how organizations organize themselves.
17 |
Using the same math, if I have 10 employees that do 90% of their job. I can hire a new employee and get them trained up to a similar position as the original 10, then take the best performing of the original 10 to work on that 100% that I'm doing, freeing me up. More employees, long-term, is less work. (Even the training, you delegate that task to a seasoned employee that you know understands the job well.)
23 |
This is why eventually you need to have multiple layers of employees. Not just people who do tasks, but managers on top of them. This way, instead of talking to 20 people, you only need to talk to 4 people, all of which are managing 5 employees each.
The employer being the direct contact of all employees works for a while. But eventually, if the company grows, you just get too many employees for it to work. So you need to also delegate away the managerial tasks.
3 |
When I interview new people I usually tell them they'll be useless for like 2 years and I expect them to stay for 5. If that doesn't work for them, totally fair, but that's what it'll take to make it a good mutually beneficial relationship. You can tell a lot by how an engineer reacts to being told they're going to be useless.
42 |
@Antody
1 month ago
Mike Rafi is not only telling me lawyer stuff but also teaches me alphabet. God bless 🙏
3.8K |