High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : ZU6yGB0-uR4
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #f8f9f9 (color 1)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeTubeEncryptID: 9f0b4dd744b8551545b3b25ad429819f83325f2485806f3aff4533294fc36e52ebf9bff8dd542952951f8cae020a0219
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1725981769191 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : WlU2eUdCMC11UjQgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
An Interesting Radical Equation !!
Jump to Connections
392 Views • Apr 20, 2023 • Click to toggle off description
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 392
Genre: Education
Uploaded At Apr 20, 2023 ^^


warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 5 (0/14 LTDR)

100.00% of the users lieked the video!!
0.00% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 100.00- Masterpiece Video

RYD date created : 2023-04-20T21:58:48.267149Z
See in json
Tags

oh hey i think you lost your tags look how to find one

Connections
Nyo connections found on the description ;_; report an issue lol

YouTube Comments - 5 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@MichaelRothwell1

1 year ago

Nice problem and nice solution! Just a couple of points that need attention, though. First, when you square both sides of the equation, you risk adding extraneous solutions, so the potential solutions found need to be checked (though I realise this would be challenging to do in a short video). As it turns out, both x=½i and x=-½i are solutions to the given equation √x+√(-x)=1. But if the equation had instead been √x+√(-x)=-1, squaring would give the same result as squaring the original equation, so the same potential solutions would be found. But as these potential solutions satisfy √x+√(-x)=1, these would be extraneous solutions for the equation √x+√(-x)=-1, which therefore has no solutions. Second, when you write √x√(-x)=√[x(-x)]=√(-x²), you are applying the rule √a√b=√(ab), which is of course true for a≥0 and b≥0, but in general we may have √a√b=√(ab) or √a√b=-√(ab). The second case applies, famously, in the case a=b=-1, where √a√b=i²=-1, but √(ab)=√[(-1)²]=√1=1. This issue is easily fixed by leaving the expression in the form √x√(-x), which when squared, gives x(-x)=-x² as before. I should mention I am assuming the usual convention that the notation √x means the principal square root of x.

|

@HansRichLee

1 year ago

What is times I mean

|

Go To Top