PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-aug2025_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 18,737
Genre: Entertainment
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At 3 weeks ago ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.961 (2/205 LTDR)
99.03% of the users lieked the video!!
0.97% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 98.55- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2025-10-31T07:23:57.37323Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Most wings are cambered, so that at 0 AoA, there is positive lift. A symmetrical aerofoil with a high enough angle of attack will generate lift, just it will generate a large amount of drag too. If the thrust is high enough to maintain a high enough angle of attack (while avoiding stall) then the plane will maintain speed and altitude, even if upside down. This is aided by the fact that, with a high thrust and AoA, a component of thrust will be opposing weight.
A note on the tanks (and fuel feed lines) is that some fuel supply mechanisms (e.g. float caburetor) rely on gravity to supply fuel, whereas others (e.g. pressure carburetor) do not; obviously you are going to struggle to maintain flight if your engine has stopped due to no fuel supply.
9 | 4
Most wings (I really wanna say all...) can generate lift both sides, it's the question if you can easy adjust the angle of attack (hope that's how you call nose-tail up/down). And engine: fuel delivery system. Back in the days regular carbureators wouldn't work... and I wanna say any carburator, I think fuel injection was introduced in aircrafts decades before land vehicles for that reason.
1 | 2
Everyone is mentioning camber, angle of incidence, etc. however, i assume the question hinges on 'sustained' inverted flight as opposed to momentary inversions (as almost all AC are capable of momentary inversion), which would be a pressurised fuel system, along with better supporting structure for the airframe...
| 0
Are you sure you didn’t pick out a question that was meant for the engineering interview, by mistake?
If I prepared months in advanced for a physics interview, studying mechanics, electrostatics, thermodynamics, and then got a question about planes flying upside down and engines, I would be pretty mad
| 0
@Zonk-ul2lh
3 weeks ago
Its Australian
41 | 1