PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 5,325,918
Genre: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Oct 29, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.944 (7,488/524,128 LTDR)
98.59% of the users lieked the video!!
1.41% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.89- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-11-21T20:25:08.728981Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The same exact thing happened to my boyfriend and I, but we got no money, he got about $40,000 of debt, totaled motorcycle, five months out of work, and a broken back in two places! Lifetime of pain.
Because the woman who hit us was uninsured and we didn’t have uninsured or underinsured on our policy. Live and learn.
9.6K |
Yes, him not driving like a lunatic may have prevented this because he wouldn't have been there at that time, but the other driver was still at fault.
Even if he was intending to keep going straight, the car is still driving into the wrong lane. Which is why I invalidated that claim by the sentence after, saying that the car was at fault.
2.1K |
@MikeRafiLawyer
3 weeks ago
For all you amateur sleuths out there: the left turn he was going to make is not where the crash happened—it is up the road at the next intersection. There is actually no road to make a left turn onto where the crash happened. As you can see, there is a solid line on the right side of the left turn lane, which means someone wanting to make a left turn needs to be in that lane before the first intersection; said in reverse, you can’t move into the left turning lane where the line is solid.
And, I understand people wanting to say, if he wouldn’t have driven like an idiot, then he would not have been at that intersection at that time. But that’s not how the law works— best way I can show you through an example: if you do not have a drivers license, but you drive anyway and then someone blows through a stop sign and hit you… you are not negligent merely because you did not have a drivers license. In fact, the jury cannot know that you did not have a drivers license. The logic is that you not having a drivers license was not the reason you got hit – it was because the other person drove on safely. so here, I think the correct ruling was that my client driving on safely a mile down the road, did not have any legal significance to whether he was at fault for causing the crash or the other driver hit him was.
Just FYI.
24K |