High Definition Standard Definition Theater
Video id : O6iDRfpGmd4
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #b89ea2 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 34908b64c865406bb2e847c00298aa3332bb5a3712a8e2a8fcb5f7e19f1f7def87268e7d658ae0996fc5965d5c678103
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732221465150 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : TzZpRFJmcEdtZDQgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
5,325,918 Views • Oct 29, 2024 • Click to toggle off description
Metadata And Engagement

Views : 5,325,918
Genre: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Oct 29, 2024 ^^


warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.944 (7,488/524,128 LTDR)

98.59% of the users lieked the video!!
1.41% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.89- Overwhelmingly Positive

RYD date created : 2024-11-21T20:25:08.728981Z
See in json
Connections
Nyo connections found on the description ;_; report an issue lol

7,994 Comments

Top Comments of this video!! :3

@MikeRafiLawyer

3 weeks ago

For all you amateur sleuths out there: the left turn he was going to make is not where the crash happened—it is up the road at the next intersection. There is actually no road to make a left turn onto where the crash happened. As you can see, there is a solid line on the right side of the left turn lane, which means someone wanting to make a left turn needs to be in that lane before the first intersection; said in reverse, you can’t move into the left turning lane where the line is solid.

And, I understand people wanting to say, if he wouldn’t have driven like an idiot, then he would not have been at that intersection at that time. But that’s not how the law works— best way I can show you through an example: if you do not have a drivers license, but you drive anyway and then someone blows through a stop sign and hit you… you are not negligent merely because you did not have a drivers license. In fact, the jury cannot know that you did not have a drivers license. The logic is that you not having a drivers license was not the reason you got hit – it was because the other person drove on safely. so here, I think the correct ruling was that my client driving on safely a mile down the road, did not have any legal significance to whether he was at fault for causing the crash or the other driver hit him was.

Just FYI.

24K |

@Akin42

3 weeks ago

Imagine driving like an absolute madman and getting into a crash with a car exactly when you were doing everything you're supposed to.

119K |

@BartyMcfarty

3 weeks ago

Got put into a tough situation and still pulled out the max settlement, sheesh

51K |

@FGlover63

3 weeks ago

998k is good but damn degloving that sucks

38K |

@14TND88

1 week ago

Your client should never be allowed to see the road again

318 |

@PopeMical

3 weeks ago

Watching this gets me more upset about the actual road layout if that's truly a primary exit from an apartment complex onto that road...
Also it's a good reminder why it's probably better to turn right and work towards turning around instead of crossing that sort of traffic to turn left.

8.4K |

@stargirl91291

3 weeks ago

The same exact thing happened to my boyfriend and I, but we got no money, he got about $40,000 of debt, totaled motorcycle, five months out of work, and a broken back in two places! Lifetime of pain.
Because the woman who hit us was uninsured and we didn’t have uninsured or underinsured on our policy. Live and learn.

9.6K |

@Havocme7

3 weeks ago

Dress for the crash, not the ride.

3.5K |

@bobs1648

1 week ago

Your client is one of those people who give good riders a bad name. Take his motorcycle license away.

721 |

@RobertAnderson-o6l

2 weeks ago

He did deserve to win this case, I agree. He should still be prosecuted for what was done before the crash.

6.1K |

@ninjahaz0180

3 weeks ago

Degloving is horrendous

791 |

@MikeyMunro

2 weeks ago

I don't believe he was going to turn left, probably going to go straight.

2.8K |

@yerboy8618

2 weeks ago

Saul Goodman ass argument😂

36 |

@Sstandard_

3 weeks ago

Yes, him not driving like a lunatic may have prevented this because he wouldn't have been there at that time, but the other driver was still at fault.

Even if he was intending to keep going straight, the car is still driving into the wrong lane. Which is why I invalidated that claim by the sentence after, saying that the car was at fault.

2.1K |

@SimonOpsi

3 weeks ago

It doesn't matter if he (the biker) was going to turn left or not. The car driver turned into oncomming traffic which is what caused the crash.

3.2K |

@superdave8248

3 weeks ago

This is why I don't do left turns in double/triple lanes of traffic. I've seen more than a few accidents in that scenario simply because the driver pulling the left turn can't see the outer lane of traffic.

1.8K |

@prism9884

2 weeks ago

I would pay $998,000 just to never experience a de-gloving injury

8 |

@Najmepolevati

2 weeks ago

I dont think he is gonna turn left anyway...he was lying about that for sure

3K |

@HerculesRockefellerESQ

3 weeks ago

"He is about to make a left turn"

Okay. 😂

1.6K |

@goldenfish5390

3 weeks ago

My view is this: reckless driving should've been a criminal charge and left our of civil court.

While the actual last 4 seconds remain for the civil case.

1K |

Go To Top