PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #b89086 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 4b4b922fdca26545888a303db79fcd3ea1b59b5c8d985e56207fd6ce8b706e6728676136ab578ca155a63bac5bea3e89
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732480537747 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : Tkp6bFlfTmd4RGMgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
142,411 Views ā¢ Mar 12, 2024 ā¢ Click to toggle off description
Speaking at the World Government Summit in Dubai, Jensen Huang, NVIDIA CEO, boldly stated: "Everybody in the world is now a programmer. This is the miracle of artificial intelligence." He believes learning to code may become obsolete as AI advances.
My take? Generative AI will NOT replace programmers. Anyone who's built real enterprise software understands the complexities involved. Asking tools like ChatGPT for code snippets isn't the same as architecting the software that runs our world.
What are your thoughts?
#coding #chatgpt #ai
Views : 142,411
Genre: Education
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Mar 12, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.879 (283/9,051 LTDR)
96.97% of the users lieked the video!!
3.03% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 95.45- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-11-12T21:10:31.79798Z
See in json
617 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Glad someone as reputable as you is saying this. The AI hype train needs a reality check.
539 |
Saying that you don't need to learn coding, because AI will do it for you is like saying that you don't need to learn math, because there will be calculators in the future
632 |
āAI is a tool, not a replacementā. Well said and So true. Thank you Mosh.
54 |
Ask him to fire all developers in nvidia and write his graphics card drivers using AI
323 |
"Don't learn to read, or write, or think, just use Google Lens"
"Don't learn to use pen and paper, just buy my keyboard"
"Don't learn to type on the keyboard, just use voice typing"
"Be stupid enough so you are completely lost without our product!"
22 |
Thank you sir for your opinions
It really boosted my passion more
Since I heard from that CEO,it got me rethinking my career ,but hearing from you just reassured me to keep pushing
24 |
Huang is an electrical engineer that has basically only worked for Nvidia (well, ok, co-founded) but he isn't invested in the greater software world or the people He is invested in Nvidia. And Nvidia is dumping literally all their money into AI so guess what he is gonna push...
23 |
Wow, i would love to see more shorts like this mosh, very impressive and useful š
17 |
AI will not replace devs, only assist them. Any senior knows this. Its like thinking that 3D printing will replace construction workers. Simply foolish to anyone with a bit of experience
24 |
Keep learning and thanks for teaching us brother š
10 |
After loosing all the hope, got some motivation from this video. Thank you Mosh ā¤
6 |
Thank you Mosh! you nailed it! It is a problem solving tool not a replacment! stay safe!
|
My perspective on this, as Iāve tried learning to code on python and C++, is that I need to learn problem solving more than understanding the syntax.
I genuinely believe that with the advancement of AI, we will need to adapt and how this looks like is learning to think in systematic ways and creative problem solving, and letting AI solve the nitty gritty and focus on the syntax. Maybe if I learn coding at a conceptual level and know why something works, I can better interact with the code and AI to solve specific problems and give better and laser targeted prompts to solve specific problems.
So in other words what Iām proposing is that we start learning and thinking in systems, a more holistic and higher level approach, that will allow us to dedicate more time to the creative side of development rather than worrying about the technical aspects of programmingā¦
Iām happy to hear what others think.
|
Absolutely agree Mosh. I'm a full stack dev of 5 years and there are far far too many things in the creation of software that an AI would simply not be able to do. They can't architect and re-architect software, configure cloud features, or modify software upon a customers new feature request. It can't understand the requirements of a business and create of modify software to the level that humans or a business needs. It really is just a helper tool to speed up development - We may find in the future software becomes much faster to create, due to these helpful AI tools... but replacing software engineers? No chance. Not at least for a VERY long time yet.
17 |
I love you mosh! You taught me python years ago and now I am about to graduate with my cs degree. This video relieved a bunch of stress around ai
|
It's so soothing to hear this from you.. Thank you Mosh... Now I'm motivated to take coding seriously again
|
I was literally waiting for someone like you to speak on this Mosh.....Thank you so much
|
I used to think Jensen was wrong because in enterprise software development which is a very human process-mapped activity with many regulated and unremovable human checks and balances, that development lifecycle would never change. But I must say with GPT 4o now, I'm not too sure anymore. If you could include GPT 4o live in your R&D meetings - just imagine this - GPT 4o could immediately draw up prototypes on the spot when you discuss about it (and share it in the teams meetings - where business analysts can work in tandem to comment and correct the understanding if it was wrong), and if its inferencing capabilities lets it understand business and human processes and then have it design the ERD diagram, create the functional & tech specifications, generate a few UI/UX themes for humans to choose from, and upon approval by a project manager, generate the entire codebase according to the approved specs. We as coders might be toast. I think this is what Jensen is talking about. I think the "AI is a tool argument" might really be 99% AI and 1% human. The coder will be completely replaced, and the only human remaining in this loop will be the non-technical business analyst.
2 |
can you elaborate on this matter perhaps on a complete video? it would be nice to hear some real world examples that ai may come short, atleast for the near future.
8 |
@awwtergirl7040
8 months ago
He doesnāt believe it. He wants the people heās selling to believe it.
607 |