PokeVideoPlayer v0.9-rev1 - licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #ba94a2 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeTubeEncryptID: c02616e6cc228f826b311f06d2708d26861b7caf2c08d5257a02364b88def3a35f05676d960479c473881ad3eda1d270
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1726091842513 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : S3lpeVNwZXB3a2sgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
321 Views ⢠May 18, 2024 ⢠Click to toggle off description
Views : 321
Genre: People & Blogs
Uploaded At May 18, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 0 (0/0 LTDR)
0% of the users lieked the video!!
0% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 0.00- Overwhelmingly Negative
RYD date created : 2024-05-19T11:05:22.610432Z
See in json
YouTube Comments - 34 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Letâs leave aside your mischaracterization of subjective morality. Have you a shred of evidence that objective morality exists?
4 |
Yes morality is subjective, or more specifically intersubjective. No, that does not make it a delusion or some kind of pretend.Â
I have the opinion, for example, that steak tastes good. Not all people believe that steak tastes good, they have different opinions because taste is subjective. My opinion on steak tasting good isnât a delusion though, itâs just an opinion I have come to due to various facts and interactions with the world.
While steak and morality are different things, both can be subjective but real, not âdelusional.â
1 |
@Gr8FullyDead420
3 months ago
First of all, morality is a mix of empathy and opinions. Opinions can be changed or influenced by facts and theyâre still opinions. So differentiating them as if opinions canât be based on facts and evidence is incorrect. Second of all, living based off of personal morals isnât pretending theyâre objective, itâs doing what your own personal morality dictates you do. Third of all, even if objective morality is more logically reasonable, it doesnât mean it actually exists. Logical arguments are not evidence for anything other than logical consistency. Finally, objective morality wouldnât point to a creator because that creator is also a subject and its sense of morality would also be subjective. It would just be a more powerful subject so youâd listen to it, which is an argument from authority, which itself is fallacious. Also, if morals were actually objective, they wouldnât change from place to place and time to time. People canât even agree on moral issues within the same place AND time. If it were objective, weâd be able to measure it in some tangible way, but we canât, because itâs subjective.
2 |