@BM-rm7vr

1 month ago

I considered a 1KM black hole. I used Schwarzschild metric to calculate mass then the total gravity in Joules. Then I divided by the number of Planck Areas. Then I got the value of
GR = 1.261 x 10^-30J. Then I took the Hawking temp of that black hole and converted to Joules and knot that value in Landauer. The Hawking Temp flattens all of the kinetic energies so only the value of a constrained degree of freedom contains. Then I got
ELandauer = 1.74 x 10^-30J.
GR = 1.261 x 10^-30J.
For a difference of .724.
Landauer is a static value. But when the difference is applied it’s apparent it’s an emission. But why not RMS? The 1.7% extra efficiency?
It appeared like gravity was emitted from the cosmological horizon into 3-D space. So, I checked to see if the negatively curved cosmic event horizon could cause this. I created a black hole model the size of the universe, and using Landauer with Hawking temp, and then I inverted the black hole event horizon divided the range by two and saw that 1.7% extra efficiency over flat. Now I have .724. The same efficiency applies no matter how large the negatively curved object is. I ran one at 13.8LY and one at 46BLY, same answer, 1.7%.

Here is how it works Quantum mechanically. Maxwell’s Demon wants to measure spin for a pair of entangled fermions. Maxwell’s demon spends 1.261 x 10^-30J to measures A’s spin and say Up emerges. The unused portion of A’s wave function, which is now Down, turns into a wormhole at 1.261 x 10^-30J which makes A and B local for an instant. That is the the gravity. Then Maxwell’s Demon spends another 1.261 x 10^-30J to measure B’s spin and B’s unused portion of the wave function to emit one photon at 1.261 x 10^-30J. There are four total bits in a two particle system. I’m an entangled system, two are constrained by the counterfactual portion of the wave function. Bob spends two units to measure, and the counterfactuals spend two units, one gravity and one a photon so all four bits are accounted for. So why would a wormhole show up at Maxwell’s price? Because A and B have the same Quantum address but different spatial addresses. A’s unused portion of the wave function could cause cloning of not dealt with properly. So the system turns that piece of information into a bit of gravity to make A and B local for a just a segment of time.

Why do I think this is emitted non-locally? I consider the universe to be made of two things, signal and structure. Consider two particles on a holographic event horizon. They are equally smeared across the entire horizon. Even if they are 1BLY apart I’m 3-D space, on the horizon they are adjacent to each other and every other particle. But A can find B if they were entangled because they have the same wave function. It acts like a key so A can step just outside of its bounds to affect B. Then all the regions of the event horizon make that same connection and emit gravity into 3-D space from that distant horizon. That horizon explains how two distant particles can communicate correlations. No causal info can be sent because the answers are random.

So, the universe according to entangled information is very small. Every point is adjacent to every point since they share a wave function they can find each other on the horizon. But causal information is different. It’s not from a single relative cosmic horizon. It’s the interactions of relative cosmic horizons. My fingers have their own cosmic Holographic horizon and my phone does to. Causation is the encoding from Holographic horizon to Holographic horizon. This is how Special Relativity emerges. As a particle moves it leaves some relative horizons and is turned to bits of gravity but it’s also crossing into previously unobserved space which means it’s turning its gravity bits back into quantum information. And all the objects the particles horizon interacts with cause time dilation and length contraction.

Dark energy is from these horizons and not from space. Say we see a distant galaxy ready to cross our cosmic horizon. It appears as the distant galaxy is very close to that horizon and being gravitated. But at that galaxy nothing seems weird. There is no giant wall of cosmic horizon gravitating them out of the universe. They look to see it’s actually we who are being dragged out of their universe by that same structure. Since both observers tell the same story of opening distance, the distance opened.

The way the value in a constrained degree of freedom showing up as the value of gravity and Hawking radiation seems solid. I don’t know why this hasn’t been found before now. And especially the lens effect from the negatively curved cosmic horizon adding 1.7% . It seems as though each particle began its existence with their own relative cosmic event horizon that tracks correlations and interacts with other horizons for causation. The relative Holographic principle helps limit the amount of data that can translate through the universe to a 2-D event horizon moving at C. It sort of seems to create stability. The way the counterfactual info becomes the worlds best quantum error proofing is equally amazing.

|