PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-aug2025_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 1,981
Genre: People & Blogs
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At 3 months ago ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.898 (6/230 LTDR)
97.46% of the users lieked the video!!
2.54% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.19- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2025-07-09T16:53:15.040143Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
This is such a helpful perspective!! I'm also a writer. I've partially drafted numerous books over a decade or two and haven't finished any ... I've had a break from writing for a couple of years, and am considering whether or not to complete any of those projects. I like the idea of repurposing what I've previously written (before I knew I was AuDHD).
5 | 0
What I'm not hearing is whether the publisher weighed in on the reuse of that past material - did they suggest doing this quietly rather than with full transparency?
While I generally don't enjoy paying for the same information twice, if an author openly acknowledges that some of their "new" material has been borrowed from previous efforts then their credibility is better maintained; however only fully retained if that material has been reviewed and revised as needed.
If the same decision to recyle is made without disclosure to the reader, then yeah, it's a cheat. Authors seem to be more accountable than publishers in this regard but ultimately it depends on who has more control.
Personally I don't reuse material without a thorough review and revision; even if the information is largely the same, I don't feel comfortable claiming ownership without having first checked my work.
4 | 0
@EricAllenGriff
2 months ago
Priceless collaboration. Thank You Taylor and Megan. Much appreciated.
2 | 0