PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 4,992
Genre: Education
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Feb 18, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.914 (7/320 LTDR)
97.86% of the users lieked the video!!
2.14% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.79- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-02-21T05:38:18.106948Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Absolutely correct! As for the age and e reliability, That's a no-brainer. Were able in short time get any vessel up to par to be seaworthy. Now we have a scrap yard with a bunch of ships with rusted out Hulls then they need to be made into a reef. I haven't heard any forward moving on that part for new reefs and quite a while. We still have battleships in reserves. Matter fact I believe that was on your channel. Matter of fact, I think there was one or two that was involved in desert shield and desert Storm. But no the answer is is no. Whether new or old, we do not have enough š«£
4 |
I wouldn't personally have any udea whatsoever. I have no understanding of America's logistical capacity to meet the need in a major military conflict in that part of the world. I know much could be moved by air. But I also know much more would necessitate adequate sea transport. Sal has all the credibility I need to answer the question for me, and his sense of urgency tells me this is a serious problemš. Hos answer is funny, but he's clear the problem is serious. I love this channel! Thank you Sal
|
Well said āNo!ā We are woefully short and have been making do with a skeleton MSC fleet. The San Diego and Florida areas donāt even have oilers readily available for refueling!! Those warships are forced to refuel inport. We canāt even support 5th and 6th fleet oiler operations at the same time without critical help from NATO oilers (the Italians smartly invested in some nice ones!! Check out ITS Vulcano, one of the coolest UNREP experiences). Forget about heavy-lifting cargo when you canāt even gas up the cargo-carrying ships out to sea on a reliable basis, let alone the destroyer escorts.
|
Why spend $4,000,000,000.00 on massive ships that are currently vulnerable to $25,000- $150,000 armed drones or suicide drones? (Like Ukraine has been taking out Russian war ships with remote controlled drones)
Shouldnāt our tax dollars be spent on the next level weapons war such as drones, computer defense/ offense, satellite and space weapons that can neutralize the targets from space, such as individuals to moving warships, to launched and flying nuclear warheads, instantly? We need innovation and progress prioritized in our weapons defense bills.
2 |
@wgowshipping
9 months ago
šØFull videošØ
https://youtu.be/X9gH6iAldOg
3 |