PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 33,877
Genre: Education
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Nov 4, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.96 (15/1,470 LTDR)
98.99% of the users lieked the video!!
1.01% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 98.48- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2025-02-27T19:59:02.854022Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Brother you want a debate let it start here in the comment section.
I am a proud Hindu with some knowledge. I will try to answer your questions.
For the question on which you got the counter question, it depends even a prostitute can get Mokhya (salvation) and priest can't.
If some one was forced to prostitution but later in life they stopped and chose a humble living then the person can get salvation.
It is basically the balance of Papa and Punya in our religion. Papa means Sin and Punya is the opposite of Papa for which there is no English word.
Now if there is a priest who is worshipping god everyday but not from his heart and only for money he is not moving towards salvation.
Do ask if you want to know anything else.
19 | 97
This is pantheistic Hinduism of Vedas, Gita, my mom is a type of monotheistic Hindu she don't follow Vedas or Gita and for her the concept that everything is part of creator God almighty is outright ridiculous one which is why her moral framework is very similar to my Catholic Christian moral framework and she is totally right about it, because if everything is part of ultimate reality and pain is just an illusion then where does even this illusion come from if all is one? You realize that he is now not talking about Ishwar/God/Khuda at all instead he is talking about an impersonal abstract substance known as Brahman or ultimate reality this is pantheistic Hinduism...
17 | 0
In Hinduism, gods arenât the endgame. Theyâre just paths, guides leading to the actual final chapter of lifeâenlightenment in Brahman, the ultimate reality. Brahman is the single consciousness from which all things manifest, the source of everything.
Unlike the Christian obsession with labeling everything as âgoodâ or âevil,â Hinduism sees righteousness and unrighteousness as codes for living in harmony with the planet. Theyâre guidelines, not absolute moral judgments stamped by a cosmic overlord. Every life accumulates karma, the residue of oneâs actions and intentions, which follows the soul like an eternal ledger. And this karma? Itâs what keeps a being tied to the cycle of reincarnation, unable to transcend to the ultimate state of liberationânirvana.
Now, Christians might recognize the concept of karma because itâs not so different from their own idea of sin. Sin, they say, separates you from God, and you need a savior to bail you out. Sound familiar? Karma works similarlyâit binds you, makes enlightenment impossible, and holds you back from merging with the divine. But hereâs the catch: in Hinduism, this savior isnât some moralizing deity wagging a finger at you from the clouds.
Instead, gods in Hinduism serve as intermediaries, helpers who guide beings (yes, beings, not just humans, because animals and other lifeforms matter too) toward liberation. They donât demand blind worship or unconditional acceptance of their rules without explanation. Letâs be honestâhow many people can truly respect a god who doesnât know them personally and yet expects unwavering obedience? A god who doles out commandments like ultimatums without so much as a decent justification?
Thatâs where the Hindu gods come in. They take on relatable forms to connect with humans and other life across different worlds. They teach, guide, and even protect while helping people navigate toward mokshaâliberation from the endless loop of reincarnation. Moksha isnât just a "get-out-of-jail-free card" for escaping the cycle of rebirth; itâs the ultimate reunion with Brahman, the source of all existence.
So while some religions focus on a single, demanding deity who insists on worship under the threat of eternal damnation, Hinduism provides a more nuanced system. Gods act as bridges, not barriers, leading beings toward self-realization and freedom. Itâs not about "accepting" a godâs authority; itâs about understanding your place in the cosmos and breaking free from the karmic chains that keep you spinning in circles.
Would you rather follow a deity who demands unquestioning allegiance or one who offers guidance without coercion? Exactly.
4 | 13
I was in the new age the anti new age did the yoga the meditation the shadow work the affirmations love light luminosity etc yet despite at times feeling wonderful there was still a void that was there.
Jesus Christ met me where I was and filled my void.
I began reading the Bible with the help of the Holy Spirit and have experienced a peace that surpasses understanding.
I stopped praising creation over the creator and have received many supernatural revelations since.
I give glory to God Most High.
Jesus Christ is my Lord and my savior and I am forever grateful to Him for His sacrifice and love for me. đ„čđ©”
Jesus loves you and He is the truth.
Ask Him to show you. Ask Him to come into your heart and show you. He will.
God Bless
2 | 0
I like the conversation too. The will of the creator is agreed upon universally that it Is all good as the in the concepts of bad things are not of his will. I believe a concious decision of doing something bad is what separates you from the will of the creator. I don't think in Hinduism you'd use bad things as a way of enlightenment. So no point saying hindus beleive that sort of concept. Only way christians can find grace is through jesus. Without him they wouldn't have a leg to stand on đ
| 0
But how is it possible that these gentlemen think they can apply their logic to God to prove their position? Totally senseless because God is unknowable to humans except through the teachings that different faiths attribute to him. And those should be limited to Every logical consideration about God is only an arbitrary and unverifiable hypothesis.
5 | 6
@Eh-Mungu-Nguvu-Yetu-q8p
5 months ago
I like that the conversation is civil
44 | 0