PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #d5dcdb (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: 2075aaeaa46cfb3dc57381b98969c6ddc0ffc1549fbc274a4bb30f7d04b6f0b3f36a2b70402ebf718a606bdc89a3a5dd
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732530461414 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : OC1PWF9vdEJwWlkgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
13,178 Views • Sep 12, 2024 • Click to toggle off description
This video illustrates the central mystery of quantum physics, the double slit experiment, in particular, the observer effect.
#quantumphysics
Views : 13,178
Genre: Science & Technology
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Sep 12, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.895 (21/776 LTDR)
97.37% of the users lieked the video!!
2.63% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 96.06- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-10-13T12:10:00.32383Z
See in json
95 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The interference pattern is pretty strong evidence that "particles" travel as real physical waves. If so, particle-like behaviors occur only when two (or more) waves interact, for instance when the electron wave is detected somewhere on the wall of detectors. With this model, the Locality axiom is violated (and must be weakened), because a portion of the electron wave was far from the point of detection a moment before the detection event.
9 |
I think Feynman once said something
Like " To understand quantum mechanics, all you have to do is understand the double slit experiment. The problem is that nobody understands itt"
10 |
How is an electron measured to determine which slit it goes through?
What would happen if you aimed the electron at one slit and sent it through, then aimed the second electron at the second slit and sent it through, and continued back-and-forth. Would it make an interference pattern then? I'm assuming not. I'm assuming the slits are so close together that you can't aim it that accurately because you don't even really know how big the electron is. If it spreads out so it can go through both slits it presumably doesn't have a real small size like we normally think of it having. I'm wondering if the method of measuring which slit it goes through actually modifies the electron so that it is no longer spread out and can no longer go through both slits. I would assume the Heisenberg uncertainty principle applies in some manner such that we can know how big the electron is or we can know exactly where it is, but we can't really know both of those things at the same time?
|
What is the difference between the electron interacts with the particle(s) on the measurement device vs the electron interacts with the particles on the slit edge? I would assume the electron has to interact with the slits edges in order to pass in between.
1 |
Observation means some type of interaction also which electro magnetic energy involved, this interaction is enough to collapse the wave function of the electrones.
|
Superposition is a misinterpretation. Perhaps when sending a single electron it doesn't disturb much the electric field.
But, when sending multiple electrons through they disturb the electric field more and produces the waves pattern. The electrons do not have to go through both slots at the same time, the disturbance in the field goes through both slits. The disturbance collapses once observing it because photons used to observe it cancels out the disturbance or waves, hence the interference pattern does not register.
So if superposition is a misinterpretation that means the many worlds theory has no foundation.
|
I have many theories about the collapsing of the wave function by measuring an electron one by one then measuring its path, this slit or that slit. That is when the observed electron, usually in a super-position, is tracked as a collapsed wave function.
My problem is it's probably been done before and have no way for testing it. So, we all bow to the mystery of the double slit experiment.
|
Time is the process by which our quantum future becomes our classical past.
|
Maybe this is evidence that a medium exists that fill the empty space. When an electron is fired, it creates a disturbance in this medium, leading to an interference pattern. Each electron follows this pattern. If the observer blocks this disturbance, the interference pattern does not appear.
1 |
Does making a measurement at one slit block that slit?
|
Superdeterminism
1 |
I love how every single comment here is some dude who thinks they've "solved" quantum mechanics in their basement
9 |
Why e- hit middle portion of both slit
|
Long live science
|
What happens if you have 3 slits?
|
Here is the problem with double slit:
Electrons when released may interact with particles that are present in the midair medium before passing through slits. What happens in vacuum, when electrons are released to pass through slits? May be energy in empty vacuum may interfere??
And so double slit is wrong experiment to conclude. The set up is the problem. Electrons travel pathway is crucial. Was the electrons/photons released in perfect straight line to pass through slits?
3 |
If the electron existed in more than our current 3 dimensions + time, a single electron could go through both holes. We should not assume that 4D is 90 degrees away from x y z.
2 |
If we can't observe the electron interacting with itself, isn't saying that it must interact with itself a bit like saying, "we don't know why anything exists therefore god"?
1 |
This so cool!
Science has no clue!!
1 |
@ArvinAsh
2 months ago
How Quantum Particles Bahave when no one is looking: https://youtu.be/Zm1xhph9iHY
2 |