PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #d1d0d6 (color 2)
Video Format : (720p) openh264 ( https://github.com/cisco/openh264) mp4a.40.2 | 44100Hz
Audio Format: 140 ( High )
PokeEncryptID: c9192af7f393a401c1a5bdc48957f54163736798338c9a680a12e9b71a0644d6a012f76e8cd8b09818f7037e35bd54f5
Proxy : eu-proxy.poketube.fun - refresh the page to change the proxy location
Date : 1732857063432 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text : M3ZiQ1U1dk1GQncgaSAgbG92ICB1IGV1LXByb3h5LnBva2V0dWJlLmZ1bg==
143 : true
24 Views β’ Jul 19, 2024 β’ Click to toggle off description
Views : 24
Genre: Film & Animation
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Jul 19, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 5 (0/12 LTDR)
100.00% of the users lieked the video!!
0.00% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 100.00- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2024-07-19T20:59:35.103336Z
See in json
14 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
Of course, because tthis is the Word of God, why would His Words be just plain talk. He is God and HIs language should be respected.
4 |
Full video here!
Answering Your KJV Questions & Comments
https://youtu.be/JGTeZujVnPU
3 |
The King James Bible does not follow a word for word translation. It follows verbal equivalence and formal equivalence. It will use what is not called "dynamic" equivalence when it is necessary because the grammar and syntax are too different.
Word for word is not the same has verbal equivalence. Word for word would not make any sense in English at all and would be a bad translation.
|
Puritans were a bunch of calvinists, those dudes didn't understand much. Calvinists arent people you should lean on for anything.
|
Secondly, the English of the time was NOT easier than the KJB. It is the exact opposite. Have you not read the Translators to the Reader or the works of King James himself? Shakespeare is contemporary with King James and his works are much harder than the KJB for modern speakers.
It seems from this short they're trying to say this as a way to glorify the Greek and Hebrew because he trys to argue the KJV English is "higher" because it translated "word for word". This is false. It didn't translate word for word and if it did it wouldn't be a good translation. It used verbal equivalence the vast majority of the time but that is not "word for word". The KJV is in English and uses English grammar and syntax as it should. Its greatness is that it is so good that if you didn't know any better you might think that the Bible was originally written in English.
The KJBRC stands for the right Bible but has so many weak and bad arguments for it.
|
There is no such thing as a word for word translation. That's an argument from both sides that isn't true. Anyone who says so has never translated, nor have they read Hebrew or Greek scripture.
|
@bigairnohander
3 months ago
Hello to all the bots and Jesuits in the comments. Thanks for confirming our understandings.β€β€β€
5 |