PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-aug2025_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
ImmersiveAmbientModecolor: #bfa1a0 (color 2)
Video Format : 136 (720p) mp4 | h264 | 44100Hz | 1078477 bps
Audio Format: 140 (AUDIO_QUALITY_MEDIUM) m4a | aac | 44100hz | STEREO(2channels)
PokeEncryptID: 5946368402eecc956c7dd79a331f0bf4119890385b9e4c0808602c34923516c2ae286f6adac243fd0f6dbedb27b001f4
Proxy/Companion URL : woke-proxy.
Date : 1760051687227 - unknown on Apple WebKit
Mystery text?? : MkpIMENCcDQ5a0UgaSAgbG92ICB1IHdva2UtcHJveHkucG9rZXR1YmUuZnVu
143 : true
539 Views • 2 months ago • Click to toggle off description
Paul uses marriage as an illustration to demonstrate the Christian's relationship to the law. After we die, the marriage relationship dissolves. Similarly, since we have died in Christ - we are dead to the law. We are no longer under law, but under grace.
This helps us understand that Paul didn't have any notion of marriage being an eternal covenant. After death, one is freed from their marriage covenant.
#lds #ldschurch #marriage #temple #ldstemple #exmo #exmormon #christianfaith #faith
Views : 539
Genre: Nonprofits & Activism
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At 2 months ago ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 5 (0/15 LTDR)
100.00% of the users lieked the video!!
0.00% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 100.00- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2025-07-16T19:41:02.783472Z
See in json
38 Comments
Top Comments of this video!! :3
This is only one of several reasons we believe that marriage is not an eternal institution. Check out all the other reasons in our full video!
7 | 1
No Paul's Gospel says Law of Moses is Dead, But the Law of God Is Forever
1 | 0
Amen
1 | 0
This will sound great in your talk
| 0
Divorce: Do i count?
1 | 0
Never say never, Paul also supposedly said women shall never speak at church, yet, they do.. mayby Paul simply wasnt the man for marriage.. well, mayby it had to do that he expected Christs return every other day, along with great tribulation, especially to women being pregnant.
1 | 1
Gods temple was never used to ordinate marriage, as how the mormons use it.
1 | 0
I am against it therefore it isn't.
| 0
Except ancient Hebrews didn't universally see it that way, which is why they asked Jesus..
"Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her.”
1 | 4
The scriptures being quoted are in reference to the lower law and the laws of man. Marriage can last forever, but only if done with God’s proper authority. Let’s look at a couple scriptures:
Genesis 2:22-24
“And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man. Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.”
Ecclesiastes 3:14
“I know that, whatsoever God doeth, it shall be for ever: nothing can be put to it, nor any thing taken from it: and God doeth it, that men should fear before him.”
So if God married Adam and Eve, and if what He does is forever, doesn’t that mean that their marriage is for forever?
Matthew 18:18
“Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
So, Christ gives his apostles his authority to bind things in heaven. So, like God did for Adam and Eve, his apostles could also bind a man and woman together such that it lasts forever. It is specific authority given to specific individuals, not general authority given to anyone who merely believes.
3 | 6
Paul, used Civil marriage as an illustration because that’s all they had was civil marriage at that time. They were not performing temple marriages. So illustration was applicable and they did not last beyond this life. Had they’ve been implementing eternal marriages at that time/temple marriages. He probably would’ve picked a different illustration or at least spoken differently. But what he said did apply to the civil marriages that existed at the time. The problem is you are conflating the words spoken of temporal marriage with unmentioned principles of eternal marriage. Just because Paul, chose not to mention it doesn’t mean it didn’t exist.
| 1
You’re taking massive liberties
| 0
@briandavis6898
2 months ago
Matthew 19:6
What therefore God hath joined together, let no man put asunder. ... Since they are no longer two but one, let no one split apart what God has joined together.”
1 | 0