...
Views : 3,983
Genre: Music
Date of upload: Apr 18, 2021 ^^
Rating : 4.545 (15/117 LTDR)
88.64% of the users lieked the video!!
11.36% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 82.96- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2022-03-03T17:51:26.128761Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
You should test it on separate tracks. Not 10 Pinks on one track. I think you can load a lot more in this case. Because one chain of plugins (plugins on one track) can utilize only one CPU core. Such a heavy chain of plugins will occupy the processor core so that another chain from another track will no longer fit in this core. In theory, such a distribution of plugins can result in underloaded processor cores. And this is not real life scenario. You don't need 10 Pinks on one track. I think you need to repeat the test with one plugin on one track. Thus, it will turn out to load the processor cores to the maximum and there will be no long heavy chains.
3 |
I'm waiting on an i9 10900k 10 core workstation w/ 128gb RAM to come in next month...this video gave me so much hope! I'm on an i7 currently with no Acustica plugins in use but hitting 150ish track projects makes the computer not wanna work with the amount of parallel processing I use. Can't wait for the upgrade, thanks for the video!
1 |
Can you specify which i9 are you using? My frĂend is having a terrible time with a brand new build with the i9 10 core at 2.8GHz and plenty of ram, can only instantiate a few Acustica's. Would be nice to see a video with a session running with all the plugins activated with the processing window open, also sample rate/bit for the session, thanks
|
@PaulThird
3 years ago
BTW this is just me testing what I have available and it's not modern like for like. For people looking for specs. ĂĂ FYI i3 and i5 were both in older lenovo laptops (2016/17) ĂĂ i3 3110M 2.7GHz (2 core) i5 5200U 2.2GHz (2 core).. I think i9 9900k 3.1GHz (8 core)
3 |