PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 5,499
Genre: Entertainment
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Oct 8, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.974 (4/610 LTDR)
99.35% of the users lieked the video!!
0.65% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 99.02- Masterpiece Video
RYD date created : 2024-11-05T20:37:37.335399Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
I think this issue should be more seriously discussed, and I appreciate your courage in bringing it up. While I do vote, I vote in near lockstep with my husband, and wouldn't at all be uncomfortable with him representing the entire family at the poll. And while I think I vote well, it must be said that I am an unusual woman - I can't say that I am impressed by the contribution women in general have made to the direction of the country at the polls.
While I don't know how best to remedy the situation, I do think proceeding in wisdom requires first a fair and wise understanding of the situation. Feminism, to include even such seemingly unanimously supported ideas as women's suffrage, seems based on simplistic and morally monomaniacal notions. I think in particular we should dispense with the notion that a patriarchal society represses women - some such societies obviously do, but others seem to me to elevate them.
An honest conversation on this topic is an essential starting place.
5 |
#revokethe19th
1 |
One vote per household. Which person goes to the polling station station is mostly irrelevant.
Is a household a unity, or a collection of individuals? We're all very clear on needing a table to be a unity, rather than a collection of molecules. In this era our bodies are making the shift from a unity to a (mere) collection of molecules.
1 |
I don't disagree with what he's said, as far as households to it's true. A bit of a problem however is that were allowed to vote at 18. While it was more common for people to be married then, there were plenty of single guys and single gals. So, you had the votes of single men and households, but no vote from the single women. So, we did actually have a group not represented. Granted, giving them the right to vote, since they are single and possible so by choice, would mean the interests of individuals over household would increase. Now, if wives mostly agree with their husband and roughly similarly, then household would be doublly represented which could potentially balance things out. But, if there are more individuals than household, and if husband and wives don't agree on politics, which is often enough the case, then individuals are more represented. But, is it really right to deny a woman who happens to be single the right to vote, particularly when we allow single men to vote?
Truthfully, i don't think there is a good solution.
|
@bruin4Christ
4 months ago
Highly controversial and totally true.
If men can’t represent the interest of their family you’ve already lost.
53 |