PokeVideoPlayer v23.9-app.js-020924_
0143ab93_videojs8_1563605_YT_2d24ba15 licensed under gpl3-or-later
Views : 8,424
Genre: Autos & Vehicles
License: Standard YouTube License
Uploaded At Jun 4, 2024 ^^
warning: returnyoutubedislikes may not be accurate, this is just an estiment ehe :3
Rating : 4.946 (6/436 LTDR)
98.64% of the users lieked the video!!
1.36% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 97.96- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-06-07T00:41:50.905622Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
The standard "6" for the 64 1/2 was also the 170 CID Falcon six. 1965 cars would switch to the 120hp 200 CID six that would also become the base engine for the Fairlane line. One interesting bit of trivia. Six cyl Falcons & Fairlanes for 64, as well as the 260 V8 cars, initially offered the lightweight, simplified 2 spd aluminum Ford-O-Matic that replaced the original Ford-O-Matic in 1959. I don't think it was known for particularly lively performance & was never offered in the Mustang. Early Mustangs even with a six used a new lighter duty 3 spd. Cruise-O-Matic.
1 |
Those ignition coils are getting VERY, hard to find.
The heat from the engine would cook the inside of it, and would kill it. But the 260 and 289, were significantly smaller than the 302. The poles on the coil would corrode and rot. I know of 3, left in my market. They are located at John and sons, Mustang parts in Jenison, Michigan.
|
@BrandonLeeBrown
5 months ago
45 years ago, 1979, a friend had a 1964 1/2 Mustang. I was helping him rebuild the front end. Well the steering and front end parts, tie rods, tie rod ends, spindles, etc, were smaller than the 1965 and the parts did not interchange and in 1979 nobody sold replacement front end parts for the 1964 1/2 Mustang. The only way to use new parts was to replace the entire front end and steering parts with 1965 parts. They were larger, fatter, thicker and stronger, but it was a big, expensive job.
6 |